Chatham Phenix National Bank v. Amsterdam Building Co.

236 A.D. 656

This text of 236 A.D. 656 (Chatham Phenix National Bank v. Amsterdam Building Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chatham Phenix National Bank v. Amsterdam Building Co., 236 A.D. 656 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Order in so far as appealed from by the defendant D. C. Berber, Inc., reversed and said defendant’s motion granted. Order in so far as appealed from by the plaintiff affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to defendant D. C- Berber, Inc., against the plaintiff. No opinion. Present —Finch, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, Martin and O’Malley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 A.D. 656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chatham-phenix-national-bank-v-amsterdam-building-co-nyappdiv-1932.