Chatham & Phenix Nat. Bank v. Tull

112 A. 744, 269 Pa. 400, 1921 Pa. LEXIS 575
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 14, 1921·No. Appeal, No. 27·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from a judgment entered for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.

We adopt the opinion of the learned President Judge of the court below, which satisfactorily disposes of the case.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chatham & Phenix Nat. Bank v. Tull, 112 A. 744, 269 Pa. 400, 1921 Pa. LEXIS 575 (Pa. 1921).

112 A. 744 (Chatham & Phenix Nat. Bank v. Tull) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vondersmith v. Sullenberger
163 A. 76 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)