Chatham Bank v. Van Veghten

5 Duer 628
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedNovember 15, 1855
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 Duer 628 (Chatham Bank v. Van Veghten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chatham Bank v. Van Veghten, 5 Duer 628 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1855).

Opinion

Bosworth, J.,

so held, on the 29th of December, 1855. The defendant retained the copy of a complaint twelve days without objection, and then moved to set it aside, because it was not folioed. Held, that the proper course was to refuse to receive it because it did not conform to the 41st rule, and that accepting and retaining it twelve days without objection, waived the defect.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goodyear v. Vosburgh
41 How. Pr. 421 (New York Supreme Court, 1870)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Duer 628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chatham-bank-v-van-veghten-nysuperctnyc-1855.