Chatfield v. State
857 So. 2d 352, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15716, 2003 WL 22399599
This text of 857 So. 2d 352 (Chatfield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Chatfield v. State, 857 So. 2d 352, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15716, 2003 WL 22399599 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
Opinion
Timothy Chatfield appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, which was entered after an eviden-tiary hearing. As the trial court’s findings are supported by competent substantial evidence, the order is affirmed. See Blanco v. State, 702 So.2d 1250, 1252 (Fla.1997).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Blanco v. State
702 So. 2d 1250 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
857 So. 2d 352, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15716, 2003 WL 22399599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chatfield-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.