Chatfield v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Chatfield v. State

814 So. 2d 1217, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5495, 2002 WL 731709

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 26, 2002

DocketNo. 1D00-4568

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 814 So. 2d 1217 (Chatfield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chatfield v. State, 814 So. 2d 1217, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5495, 2002 WL 731709 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On this direct appeal following resen-tencing pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), appellant argues that his primary offense of sexual battery on a child age twelve or older but less than eighteen by a familial custodian in violation of section 794.011(8)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), should have been scored as a Level 7, rather than a Level 9, offense. He alleges, further, that the error resulted in an improper departure sentence without written reasons. The state concedes that the outcome of this appeal is controlled by our recent decision in Holt v. State, 808 So.2d 290 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Accordingly, as in Holt, we reverse and remand for resentencing scoring the primary offense as a Level 7 offense pursuant to the 1994 guidelines.

REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

ALLEN, C.J., MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On this direct appeal following resen-tencing pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), appellant argues that his primary offense of sexual battery on a child age twelve or older but less than eighteen by a familial custodian in violation of section 794.011(8)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), should have been scored as a Level 7, rather than a Level 9, offense. He alleges, further, that the error resulted in an improper departure sentence without written reasons. The state concedes that the outcome of this appeal is controlled by our recent decision in Holt v. State, 808 So.2d 290 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Accordingly, as in Holt, we reverse and remand for resentencing scoring the primary offense as a Level 7 offense pursuant to the 1994 guidelines.

REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

ALLEN, C.J., MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

814 So. 2d 1217, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5495, 2002 WL 731709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chatfield-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack