Chatfield v. State

814 So. 2d 1217, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5495, 2002 WL 731709
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 26, 2002·No. No. 1D00-4568·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On this direct appeal following resen-tencing pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), appellant argues that his primary offense of sexual battery on a child age twelve or older but less than eighteen by a familial custodian in violation of section 794.011(8)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), should have been scored as a Level 7, rather than a Level 9, offense. He alleges, further, that the error resulted in an improper departure sentence without written reasons. The state concedes that the outcome of this appeal is controlled by our recent decision in Holt v. State, 808 So.2d 290 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Accordingly, as in Holt, we reverse and remand for resentencing scoring the primary offense as a Level 7 offense pursuant to the 1994 guidelines.

REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

ALLEN, C.J., MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chatfield v. State, 814 So. 2d 1217, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5495, 2002 WL 731709 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

814 So. 2d 1217 (Chatfield v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Willis v. State
823 So. 2d 233 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Hartney v. PIEDMONT TECHNOLOGY, INC.
814 So. 2d 1217 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)