Chastain v. State
148 So. 917, 25 Ala. App. 613
This text of 148 So. 917 (Chastain v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Chastain v. State, 148 So. 917, 25 Ala. App. 613 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).
Opinion
The evidence was in conflict. The testimony for the state made a clear case under either count of the indictment. The motion to exclude the evidence was properly overruled.
We have examined the record, and find no reversible error, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
148 So. 917, 25 Ala. App. 613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chastain-v-state-alactapp-1933.