Chastain v. State

148 So. 917, 25 Ala. App. 613
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided April 18, 1933·No. 8 Div. 641.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

The evidence was in conflict. The testimony for the state made a clear case under either count of the indictment. The motion to exclude the evidence was properly overruled.

We have examined the record, and find no reversible error, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chastain v. State, 148 So. 917, 25 Ala. App. 613 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).

148 So. 917 (Chastain v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.