Chastain v. Smith
This text of 47 Ga. 473 (Chastain v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The record or bill of exceptions must disclose the fact that the brief of evidence accompanying the motion for a new trial was approved by the Court, or agreed upon by the parties or their counsel. (R.)
New trial. Brief of evidence. Practice in the Supreme Court. Before the Supreme Court. January Term, 1873.
When this case was called a motion was made by counsel for defendants to dismiss the writ of error, on the ground that there was no evidence of the fact in the record that the brief of evidence on the motion for a new trial had been approved by the Court or agreed upon by the parties. Counsel for plaintiff in error refusing to make tlie necessary affidavit, [474]*474upon a suggestion of a dimunition of the record, the writ of error was dismissed. ■
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
47 Ga. 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chastain-v-smith-ga-1873.