Chastain v. Lumpkin

67 S.E. 818, 134 Ga. 219, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 157
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 3, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 67 S.E. 818 (Chastain v. Lumpkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chastain v. Lumpkin, 67 S.E. 818, 134 Ga. 219, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 157 (Ga. 1910).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Where counsel prepared and filed a petition in behalf of a-wife against her husband, praying for a divorce and for alimony permanent and temporary, and before the defendant was served the wife notified her counsel and the sheriff in writing that she had withdrawn the suit, and directed her counsel to proceed no further with the case, and where-it further appeared that the husband and wife had “resumed their relations to each other as husband and wife,” the wife’s counsel can not thereafter press the case, over the wife’s protest, by having service of the petition perfected and obtaining a judgment for fees.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, C. J., absent, and Lumpkin, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hyder v. Hyder
97 S.E.2d 505 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1957)
In Re DePass
97 S.E.2d 505 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1957)
Williams v. Williams
4 S.E.2d 195 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Keefer v. Keefer
78 S.E. 462 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 S.E. 818, 134 Ga. 219, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chastain-v-lumpkin-ga-1910.