Chastain v. Lindley

127 N.E. 792, 73 Ind. App. 448, 1920 Ind. App. LEXIS 144
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 17, 1920
DocketNo. 10,831
StatusPublished

This text of 127 N.E. 792 (Chastain v. Lindley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chastain v. Lindley, 127 N.E. 792, 73 Ind. App. 448, 1920 Ind. App. LEXIS 144 (Ind. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Dausman, J.

Appellants instituted this action to review a judgment for errors of law appearing in the proceedings. §§645, 646 Burns 1914, §§614, 615 R. S. 1881. The cause was tried on a transcript of the record made in the original action. The court made a general finding for the appellee and rendered judgment that appellants take nothing by their action. The only alleged error presented here is that the court erred in holding that there is evidence to sustain the decision in the original action. We have examined that evidence and we find that it tends fairly to sustain the decision.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 N.E. 792, 73 Ind. App. 448, 1920 Ind. App. LEXIS 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chastain-v-lindley-indctapp-1920.