Chasmar-King Supply Co. v. Dowd

64 S.E. 1134, 150 N.C. 790, 1909 N.C. LEXIS 152
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 28, 1909·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

This cause was before this Court at Fall Term, 1907 (146 N. C., 191), and a new trial granted. The majority of the Court are of opinion that the evidence introduced on the second trial is substantially the same as that introduced on the first and that the questions now presented are covered by the former opinion.

Mr. Justice Hoke is of opinion that there is some new evidence which should have been submitted upon the issue as to the statute of limitations.

The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chasmar-King Supply Co. v. Dowd, 64 S.E. 1134, 150 N.C. 790, 1909 N.C. LEXIS 152 (N.C. 1909).

64 S.E. 1134 (Chasmar-King Supply Co. v. Dowd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gilbert v. . Machine Co.
61 S.E. 176 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1908)