Chasidy Gonnella and Andrew Ottaway v. David S. Kohm and Associates

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 8, 2014·No. 02-13-00415-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00415-CV

CHASIDY GONNELLA AND APPELLANTS ANDREW OTTAWAY

V.

DAVID S. KOHM AND APPELLEE ASSOCIATES

------------

FROM THE 355TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOOD COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

We have considered appellants’ “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” It is the

court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellants, for which let execution

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DELIVERED: May 8, 2014

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chasidy Gonnella and Andrew Ottaway v. David S. Kohm and Associates, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Chasidy Gonnella and Andrew Ottaway v. David S. Kohm and Associates (Chasidy Gonnella and Andrew Ottaway v. David S. Kohm and Associates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.