Chase v. William Penn Life Insurance
This text of 565 N.E.2d 1265 (Chase v. William Penn Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs. There being support in the record, this Court may not disturb the affirmed finding of fact that decedent made no material misrepresentation in his application for insurance. It is therefore unnecessary to reach the issue of the trial court’s evidentiary rulings pertaining to the separate question of defendant’s reliance on the alleged misrepresentations.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
565 N.E.2d 1265, 76 N.Y.2d 999, 564 N.Y.S.2d 714, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 4431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chase-v-william-penn-life-insurance-ny-1990.