Chase v. Warden

139 A.2d 508, 216 Md. 627
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided September 1, 1998·No. [H.C. No. 98, September Term, 1957.]·Published

Opinion

216 Md. 627 (1958)
139 A.2d 508

CHASE
v.
WARDEN OF MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION

[H.C. No. 98, September Term, 1957.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided March 21, 1958.

Before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

The petitioner's sole contention in this application for leave to appeal from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus is that he is entitled to have time spent by him on parole credited to his original sentence. Whether a person returned to custody for violation of parole is to receive such credit is a matter resting in the discretion of the Board of Parole and Probation. Article 41, section 115, Code (1957). A failure of the Board to exercise its discretion so as to grant credit does not deprive the petitioner of any constitutional *628 right, even if we assume, without deciding, that such a question could be raised on habeas corpus. Clark v. Warden, 213 Md. 641, 642.

Application denied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chase v. Warden, 139 A.2d 508, 216 Md. 627 (Md. 1998).

139 A.2d 508 (Chase v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clark v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
131 A.2d 396 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1977)
Chase v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
139 A.2d 508 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1958)