Chase v. Warden
This text of Chase v. Warden (Chase v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8022
WARREN CHASE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:08-cv-01702-CCB)
Submitted: February 25, 2009 Decided: March 9, 2009
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Warren Chase, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Warren Chase, a Maryland inmate, appeals a district
court order dismissing without prejudice his “emergency”
pleading for failing to provide a more detailed supplement. We
have reviewed the record and the district court order and affirm
for the reasons cited by the district court. See Chase v.
Warden, No. 1:08-cv-01702-CCB (D. Md. July 29, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Chase v. Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chase-v-warden-ca4-2009.