Chase v. Warden

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 9, 2009
Docket08-8022
StatusUnpublished

This text of Chase v. Warden (Chase v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chase v. Warden, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8022

WARREN CHASE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:08-cv-01702-CCB)

Submitted: February 25, 2009 Decided: March 9, 2009

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Warren Chase, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Warren Chase, a Maryland inmate, appeals a district

court order dismissing without prejudice his “emergency”

pleading for failing to provide a more detailed supplement. We

have reviewed the record and the district court order and affirm

for the reasons cited by the district court. See Chase v.

Warden, No. 1:08-cv-01702-CCB (D. Md. July 29, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Chase v. Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chase-v-warden-ca4-2009.