Chase v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons
This text of Chase v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons (Chase v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BENJAMIN CHASE, Case No. 21-cv-07566-JSC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER OF TRANSFER 9 v. 10 U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, ll Defendant. 12 This is a habeas case filed pro se by a federal prisoner under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The 13 || petition is directed to the execution of Petitioner's sentence in that he contends that prison officials 14 || have unlawfully failed to calculate his presentence time credits. See United States v. Giddings, 3 15 || 740 F.2d 770, 772 (9th Cir. 1984) (federal prisoner’s presentence time credit claim relates to the a 16 || execution of his sentence and is properly brought 28 U.S.C. § 2241). 3 17 Petitioner is incarcerated at the United States Penitentiary in Beaumont, Texas, which lies S 18 || within the venue of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Venue is 19 || proper in a habeas action in either the district of confinement or the district of conviction, 28 20 U.S.C. § 2241(d); however, the district of confinement is the preferable forum to review the 21 execution of a sentence. Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989). This petition 22 || therefore is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: October 15, 2021 25 J 5 | □ 26 ne ACQUELINE SCOTT CORLE 27 United States Magistrate Judge 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Chase v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chase-v-us-bureau-of-prisons-cand-2021.