Chase v. Stockett
19 A. 761, 72 Md. 235, 1890 Md. LEXIS 29
Opinion
We all agree that the decree in this case must be affirmed. The questions are fully considered and the authorities fully reviewed by the learned Judge in the opinion filed in the Court below. And we shall affirm the decree for the reasons stated, and upon the authorities relied on by the Judge below. What we have said will dispose of all the appeals taken from the same decree. The costs in both Courts will be paid out of the estate in the hands of the executors.
Decree affirmed, and cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chase v. Stockett, 19 A. 761, 72 Md. 235, 1890 Md. LEXIS 29 (Md. 1890).
19 A. 761 (Chase v. Stockett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gallaudet University v. National Society of the Daughters of the American Revolution
699 A.2d 531 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1997)
Byrd v. Byrd
126 S.E.2d 270 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Seifert v. Kepner & Central Trust Capital Bank
177 A.2d 859 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1962)
Loats Female Orphan Asylum v. Essom
150 A.2d 742 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1959)
Second National Bank v. Second National Bank
190 A. 215 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1937)
Earle v. Barrett
180 S.E. 855 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
In Re Estate of Hull
163 A. 819 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1933)
Elwyn v. De Garmendia
128 A. 913 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1925)
Lamb v. King
62 A. 493 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1905)
Baker v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.
48 A. 920 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1901)