Chase v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Chase v. State

168 Tex. Crim. 398

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedOctober 28, 1959

DocketNo. 30,870

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 168 Tex. Crim. 398 (Chase v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chase v. State, 168 Tex. Crim. 398 (Tex. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is an appeal in a bail bond forfeiture case.

There is nothing in the record showing that a brief has been filed in this court, as required by the Rules of Civil Procedure. Art. 866, C.C.P.

Failure to comply with the rules requiring the filing of briefs authorizes a dismissal of the appeal for the want of prosecution. Hebert v. State, 158 Texas Cr. Rep. 271, 255 S.W. 2d 201; Dunn v. State, 160 Texas Cr. Rep. 37, 267 S.W. 2d 144; Bell v. State, 244 S.W. 2d 210.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is an appeal in a bail bond forfeiture case.

There is nothing in the record showing that a brief has been filed in this court, as required by the Rules of Civil Procedure. Art. 866, C.C.P.

Failure to comply with the rules requiring the filing of briefs authorizes a dismissal of the appeal for the want of prosecution. Hebert v. State, 158 Texas Cr. Rep. 271, 255 S.W. 2d 201; Dunn v. State, 160 Texas Cr. Rep. 37, 267 S.W. 2d 144; Bell v. State, 244 S.W. 2d 210.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 Tex. Crim. 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chase-v-state-texcrimapp-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack