Chase v. State
168 Tex. Crim. 398
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 28, 1959·No. No. 30,870·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
This is an appeal in a bail bond forfeiture case.
There is nothing in the record showing that a brief has been filed in this court, as required by the Rules of Civil Procedure. Art. 866, C.C.P.
Failure to comply with the rules requiring the filing of briefs authorizes a dismissal of the appeal for the want of prosecution. Hebert v. State, 158 Texas Cr. Rep. 271, 255 S.W. 2d 201; Dunn v. State, 160 Texas Cr. Rep. 37, 267 S.W. 2d 144; Bell v. State, 244 S.W. 2d 210.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chase v. State, 168 Tex. Crim. 398 (Tex. 1959).
168 Tex. Crim. 398 (Chase v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gregory v. State
172 Tex. Crim. 441 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1962)