Chase v. State

683 S.E.2d 92, 299 Ga. App. 509, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 2774, 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 898
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Chase v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 293 Ga. App. 415
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided August 4, 2009·No. A08A1506·Published

Opinion

ANDREWS, Presiding Judge.

In Chase v. State, 285 Ga. 693 (681 SE2d 116) (2009), the Supreme Court reversed Division 2 of this court’s opinion in Chase v. State, 293 Ga. App. 415, 417 (667 SE2d 195) (2008). The Supreme Court held that the trial court erred in preventing Chase from presenting a consent defense at trial and reversed our judgment to the contrary.

Accordingly, our judgment in this case is vacated, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and this case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

Judgment reversed and case remanded.

Bernes and Doyle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chase v. State, 683 S.E.2d 92, 299 Ga. App. 509, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 2774, 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 898 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009).

683 S.E.2d 92 (Chase v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chase v. State
681 S.E.2d 116 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2009)
Chase v. State
667 S.E.2d 195 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)