Chase v. State

683 S.E.2d 92, 299 Ga. App. 509, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 2774, 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 898
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedAugust 4, 2009
DocketA08A1506
StatusPublished

This text of 683 S.E.2d 92 (Chase v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chase v. State, 683 S.E.2d 92, 299 Ga. App. 509, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 2774, 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 898 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

ANDREWS, Presiding Judge.

In Chase v. State, 285 Ga. 693 (681 SE2d 116) (2009), the Supreme Court reversed Division 2 of this court’s opinion in Chase v. State, 293 Ga. App. 415, 417 (667 SE2d 195) (2008). The Supreme Court held that the trial court erred in preventing Chase from presenting a consent defense at trial and reversed our judgment to the contrary.

Accordingly, our judgment in this case is vacated, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and this case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

Judgment reversed and case remanded.

Bernes and Doyle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chase v. State
681 S.E.2d 116 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2009)
Chase v. State
667 S.E.2d 195 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
683 S.E.2d 92, 299 Ga. App. 509, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 2774, 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chase-v-state-gactapp-2009.