Chase v. State

230 So. 3d 629
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 1, 2017·No. Case No. 5D15-3237·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

> We remand for the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error in Count II of the written sentence to reflect the imposition of a twenty-five-year minimum mandatory sentence consistent with the court’s oral pronouncement. We otherwise affirm. •.

REVERSED in part; AFFIRMED in part; and REMANDED.

COHEN, C.J., EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chase v. State, 230 So. 3d 629 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

230 So. 3d 629 (Chase v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Antuan Deangelos Williams v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025