Chase v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Chase v. SAIF Corp.

698 P.2d 981, 73 Or. App. 348, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 3126

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedApril 24, 1985

Docket82-10712; CA A31663

StatusPublished

This text of 698 P.2d 981 (Chase v. SAIF Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chase v. SAIF Corp., 698 P.2d 981, 73 Or. App. 348, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 3126 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The issue is whether claimant proved by a preponderance of the evidence that her need in 1982 for medical services for chronic low back strain was materially caused by her 1980 compensable injury. If so, SAIF must pay her medical expenses. ORS 656.245. The referee held that she did; the Workers’ Compensation Board reversed. On de novo review, ORS 656.298(6), we agree with the referee.

Reversed; referee’s order reinstated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

The issue is whether claimant proved by a preponderance of the evidence that her need in 1982 for medical services for chronic low back strain was materially caused by her 1980 compensable injury. If so, SAIF must pay her medical expenses. ORS 656.245. The referee held that she did; the Workers’ Compensation Board reversed. On de novo review, ORS 656.298(6), we agree with the referee.

Reversed; referee’s order reinstated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

698 P.2d 981, 73 Or. App. 348, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 3126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chase-v-saif-corp-orctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack