Chase v. Ries
10 Cal. 517
Opinion
Baldwin, J., and Field, J., concurring.
This is an action on an appeaj-bond, executed by defendants, conditioned to pay the judgment appealed from, if the same should be affirmed by the Appellate Court.
it appears, from the record, that the judgment appealed from was reversed, with directions to the Court below to enter a dif[518] ferent judgment, consequently no liability attached to defendants under the conditions of the bond.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chase v. Ries, 10 Cal. 517 (Cal. 1858).
10 Cal. 517 (Chase v. Ries) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hood v. Verdugo Lumber Co.
27 P.2d 897 (California Supreme Court, 1933)
Fitchner v. American Surety Co.
2 F. Supp. 321 (N.D. Florida, 1933)
Nolan v. Glynn
183 Iowa 21 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1918)
Bem v. Shoemaker
64 N.W. 544 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1895)
Orr v. Hopkins
3 N.M. 142 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1884)