Chase v. Peay

98 F. App'x 253
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 2, 2004·No. No. 03-7818·Published·Cited by 97 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Warren Chase appeals a district court order granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing his amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court opinion and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Chase v. Peay, 286 F.Supp.2d 523 (D.Md.2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chase v. Peay, 98 F. App'x 253 (4th Cir. 2004).

98 F. App'x 253 (Chase v. Peay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parks v. Jhonson
D. Maryland, 2025
Bobbitt v. Weber
D. Maryland, 2025
DePaola v. Scruggs
D. Maryland, 2025
Durbin, Sr. v. Wolfe
D. Maryland, 2025
King v. Weber
D. Maryland, 2025
Manley v. McCulligan
D. Maryland, 2025
Barnes v. Henry
D. Maryland, 2025
Davis v. Abello
D. Maryland, 2025
Owens v. Bivens
D. Maryland, 2025
Brown v. Corizon Health
D. Maryland, 2024
Walker v. Rowe
D. Maryland, 2024
Pitts v. Dean
D. Maryland, 2024
Nolan v. Markle
D. Maryland, 2024
Floyd v. Hansen
D. Maryland, 2024
Evans v. Schultz
D. Maryland, 2024
Neal-Williams v. Daramy
D. Maryland, 2024