Chase v. McCay

21 La. Ann. 195
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 15, 1869·No. No. 2146·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Howell, J.

This is an action to annul a donation of certain immovable property in the town of Clinton, Louisiana, made by a mother to her daughter in consideration of her affection for and indebtedness to the donee, and to subject said property to the judicial mortgage of plaintiff.

The evidence shows that plaintiff’s claim existed prior to the date of the act of donation, and that upon issuing an execution on his judgment, obtained shortly after said date, no property, in the name of the judgment debtor, could be found and the execution was returned unsatisfied. We consider the act in question to be a gratuitous donation, notwithstanding the recital of indebtedness therein, as it does not1 [196] profess to extinguish any part thereof hut declares the donation to he an extra portion and not to he accounted for at the partition of the donor’s estate.

As such it is presumed to he fraudulent, C. C. 1975, and it was incumbent on the defendants and appellants to show that the donor had sufficient property, at least, to satisfy plaintiff’s demand.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chase v. McCay, 21 La. Ann. 195 (La. 1869).

21 La. Ann. 195 (Chase v. McCay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

LeBlanc v. American Emp. Ins. Co.
364 So. 2d 263 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1979)
Platt v. Schreyer
25 F. 83 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1885)
Dowell v. Applegate
15 F. 419 (D. Oregon, 1883)