Chase v. Khamarji, No. Cv 91 28 15 68 (May 22, 1991)

Connecticut Superior Court

Chase v. Khamarji, No. Cv 91 28 15 68 (May 22, 1991)

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 4229

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedMay 22, 1991

DocketNo. CV 91 28 15 68

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 4229 (Chase v. Khamarji, No. Cv 91 28 15 68 (May 22, 1991)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chase v. Khamarji, No. Cv 91 28 15 68 (May 22, 1991), 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 4229 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] RE: APPLICATION FOR PREJUDGMENT REMEDY Plaintiffs David B. Chase and Ann L. Chase seek a pre judgment remedy of attachment to secure their claim for $90,000. They purchased property from the defendants Nicholas Khamarji, Oswaldo Suarez, and William Sam. Jr. Contrary the provisions of the contract of sale and the warranties and covenants in the deed, the property was encumbered by a $90,000 attachment. A judgment lien for a judgment in excess of $90,000 was subsequently filed on the land records. The plaintiffs now sue for breach of contract and breach of warranty.

The defendants claim the judgment for $98,946.78 is invalid as having been obtained in contravention of the bankruptcy laws. This claim is a collateral attack of a judgment. "Unless the invalidity of a judgment appears on the face of the record, the judgment is not vulnerable to collateral attack." Jensen v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co., 158 Conn. 251, 260 (1969). The evidence shows a valid judgment. This is not a proceeding against the judgment creditor's enforcing the judgment.

Probable cause exists to secure a claim for $90,000.00, together with interest and costs. A prejudgment remedy of attachment to secure the sum of $105,000.00 may issue. CT Page 4230

THIM, JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] RE: APPLICATION FOR PREJUDGMENT REMEDY Plaintiffs David B. Chase and Ann L. Chase seek a pre judgment remedy of attachment to secure their claim for $90,000. They purchased property from the defendants Nicholas Khamarji, Oswaldo Suarez, and William Sam. Jr. Contrary the provisions of the contract of sale and the warranties and covenants in the deed, the property was encumbered by a $90,000 attachment. A judgment lien for a judgment in excess of $90,000 was subsequently filed on the land records. The plaintiffs now sue for breach of contract and breach of warranty.

The defendants claim the judgment for $98,946.78 is invalid as having been obtained in contravention of the bankruptcy laws. This claim is a collateral attack of a judgment. "Unless the invalidity of a judgment appears on the face of the record, the judgment is not vulnerable to collateral attack." Jensen v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co., 158 Conn. 251, 260 (1969). The evidence shows a valid judgment. This is not a proceeding against the judgment creditor's enforcing the judgment.

Probable cause exists to secure a claim for $90,000.00, together with interest and costs. A prejudgment remedy of attachment to secure the sum of $105,000.00 may issue. CT Page 4230

THIM, JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 4229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chase-v-khamarji-no-cv-91-28-15-68-may-22-1991-connsuperct-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack