Chase v. Jennings

38 Me. 44
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1854·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Tenney, J.

— The husband and wife, being considered in law as one, when the marriage took place between Peleg Hains and the sister of the defendant, he held the same relationship by affinity to her relatives, that she did; and she stood in the same relation to his relatives. But those sustaining a relationship to him, would not hold the same to her relatives; and those related to her would not hold the same relation to his relatives. 1 Bouvier, (5th ed.) 80. Under R. S., c. 1, § 3, rule 22, there was no disqualifying interest in the juror. Exceptions overruled.

Shepley, C. J., and Appleton and Cutting, J. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chase v. Jennings, 38 Me. 44 (Me. 1854).

38 Me. 44 (Chase v. Jennings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Criminal Injuries Compensation Board v. Remson
384 A.2d 58 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1978)
Kest v. State
146 N.E.2d 755 (Cuyahoga County Probate Court, 1957)
Territory of Hawaii v. Wright
37 Haw. 40 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1944)
Doyle v. Commonwealth
40 S.E. 925 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1902)
State ex rel. Perez v. Wall
41 Fla. 463 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1899)