Chase v. Everd
This text of Chase v. Everd (Chase v. Everd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6321
WARREN CHASE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WAYNE M. EVERD; THE ANNAPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:07-cv-02581-CCB)
Submitted: May 22, 2008 Decided: May 30, 2008
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Warren Chase, Appellant Pro Se. Michael John Winkelman, MCCARTHY & COSTELLO, LLP, Bowie, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Warren Chase appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint seeking the return of property and money
as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Chase v. Everd, No. 1:07-cv-02581-CCB
(D. Md. Jan. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Chase v. Everd, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chase-v-everd-ca4-2008.