Chase v. Everd

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 30, 2008
Docket08-6321
StatusUnpublished

This text of Chase v. Everd (Chase v. Everd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chase v. Everd, (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6321

WARREN CHASE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WAYNE M. EVERD; THE ANNAPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:07-cv-02581-CCB)

Submitted: May 22, 2008 Decided: May 30, 2008

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Warren Chase, Appellant Pro Se. Michael John Winkelman, MCCARTHY & COSTELLO, LLP, Bowie, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Warren Chase appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his complaint seeking the return of property and money

as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated

by the district court. See Chase v. Everd, No. 1:07-cv-02581-CCB

(D. Md. Jan. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Chase v. Everd, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chase-v-everd-ca4-2008.