Chase v. Edwards & Bull

New York Supreme Court

Chase v. Edwards & Bull

2 Wend. 283

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedMay 15, 1829

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 2 Wend. 283 (Chase v. Edwards & Bull) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chase v. Edwards & Bull, 2 Wend. 283 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1829).

Pincite

Opinion

. By the Court, Marcy, J.

The jurat may be an essential part of the papers served, as without it, facts stated may be unintelligible. The books of practice say that the officer’s name, but not the date, may be omitted. When essential, the jurat must be given. The other objection, however, is fatal: the attorney, and not the clerk in the attorney’s office, should make the affidavit, unless a sufficient excuse is offered for the omission. The motion is denied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

. By the Court, Marcy, J.

The jurat may be an essential part of the papers served, as without it, facts stated may be unintelligible. The books of practice say that the officer’s name, but not the date, may be omitted. When essential, the jurat must be given. The other objection, however, is fatal: the attorney, and not the clerk in the attorney’s office, should make the affidavit, unless a sufficient excuse is offered for the omission. The motion is denied, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Wend. 283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chase-v-edwards-bull-nysupct-1829.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack