Chase v. Dodge

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Chase v. Dodge

59 N.H. 350

Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided December 5, 1879·Published

Opinion

Foster, J.

An amendment of a declaration averring substantially the same facts, does not change the cause of action, and, the rights of third persons not being affected thereby, it should be allowed “ for the prevention of gross injustice.” G. L., c. 226, s. 9; Laws of 1879, c. 7.

The matter of costs will be arranged at the trial term.

Case discharged.

Allen, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foster, J.

An amendment of a declaration averring substantially the same facts, does not change the cause of action, and, the rights of third persons not being affected thereby, it should be allowed “ for the prevention of gross injustice.” G. L., c. 226, s. 9; Laws of 1879, c. 7.

The matter of costs will be arranged at the trial term.

Case discharged.

Allen, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Chase v. Dodge, 59 N.H. 350 (N.H. 1879).

Pincite

59 N.H. 350 (Chase v. Dodge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.