Chase v. Corson

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Chase v. Corson

32 A. 775, 67 N.H. 598

DecidedDecember 5, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 32 A. 775 (Chase v. Corson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chase v. Corson, 32 A. 775, 67 N.H. 598 (N.H. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Assumpsit, for money paid for repairs of a steam boiler which the plaintiffs bought of the defendant. Subject to exception, the plaintiffs were permitted to amend by filing a count for a breach of the defendant’s warranty of the boiler. A former owner of the boiler, called by the defendant, testified to its condition, quality, and value when the plaintiffs bought it, to its cost when new, and to the number of years it had been run. On cross-examination he was allowed to testify, subject to the defendant’s exception, that he paid $175 for the boiler and some other articles. The exceptions Avere overruled.

Wallace, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Assumpsit, for money paid for repairs of a steam boiler which the plaintiffs bought of the defendant. Subject to exception, the plaintiffs were permitted to amend by filing a count for a breach of the defendant’s warranty of the boiler. A former owner of the boiler, called by the defendant, testified to its condition, quality, and value when the plaintiffs bought it, to its cost when new, and to the number of years it had been run. On cross-examination he was allowed to testify, subject to the defendant’s exception, that he paid $175 for the boiler and some other articles. The exceptions Avere overruled.

Wallace, J., did not sit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A. 775, 67 N.H. 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chase-v-corson-nh-1893.