Chase v. Chase

3 Balt. C. Rep. 413

Opinion

BOND, J.—

This demurrer must be sustained, I think, upon the principle that equity has no jurisdiction to enforce such a decree for alimony rendered by a court of another State, the remedy at law being adequate.

Davis vs. Davis, 299 App. D. C., 258; 9 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1169.

The remaining questions I leave to be decided as they may be presented hereafter.

See 28 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1069 note.

20 Annot. Cas. 1069 note.

2 Annot. Cas. 820 note.

3 Annot. Cas. 579 note.