Chase v. Chase

3 Balt. C. Rep. 413
CourtBaltimore City Circuit Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1916
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Balt. C. Rep. 413 (Chase v. Chase) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Baltimore City Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chase v. Chase, 3 Balt. C. Rep. 413 (Md. Super. Ct. 1916).

Opinion

BOND, J.—

This demurrer must be sustained, I think, upon the principle that equity has no jurisdiction to enforce such a decree for alimony rendered by a court of another State, the remedy at law being adequate.

Davis vs. Davis, 299 App. D. C., 258; 9 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1169.

The remaining questions I leave to be decided as they may be presented hereafter.

See 28 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1069 note.

20 Annot. Cas. 1069 note.

2 Annot. Cas. 820 note.

3 Annot. Cas. 579 note.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Balt. C. Rep. 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chase-v-chase-mdcirctctbalt-1916.