Chase v. Chase
This text of 3 Balt. C. Rep. 413 (Chase v. Chase) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Baltimore City Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This demurrer must be sustained, I think, upon the principle that equity has no jurisdiction to enforce such a decree for alimony rendered by a court of another State, the remedy at law being adequate.
Davis vs. Davis, 299 App. D. C., 258; 9 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1169.
The remaining questions I leave to be decided as they may be presented hereafter.
See 28 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1069 note.
20 Annot. Cas. 1069 note.
2 Annot. Cas. 820 note.
3 Annot. Cas. 579 note.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Balt. C. Rep. 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chase-v-chase-mdcirctctbalt-1916.