Chase v. Carter

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Chase v. Carter

79 N.W. 307, 76 Minn. 367, 1899 Minn. LEXIS 602

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedMay 22, 1899

DocketNos. 11,679—(145)

StatusPublished

This text of 79 N.W. 307 (Chase v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chase v. Carter, 79 N.W. 307, 76 Minn. 367, 1899 Minn. LEXIS 602 (Mich. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The return in this appeal fails to show in what manner the case was disposed of on the trial. It does not contain the verdict, if one there was, or the decision of the court, if made, or, if a judgment has been entered, what it is. On such an incomplete and defective record, the appellant is not entitled to be heard upon his exception to the rulings of the court assigned as error. Anderson v. Kittell, 37 Minn. 125, 33 N. W. 330.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The return in this appeal fails to show in what manner the case was disposed of on the trial. It does not contain the verdict, if one there was, or the decision of the court, if made, or, if a judgment has been entered, what it is. On such an incomplete and defective record, the appellant is not entitled to be heard upon his exception to the rulings of the court assigned as error. Anderson v. Kittell, 37 Minn. 125, 33 N. W. 330.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 N.W. 307, 76 Minn. 367, 1899 Minn. LEXIS 602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chase-v-carter-minn-1899.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack