Chase v. Bogardus

243 P. 546, 78 Colo. 573, 1926 Colo. LEXIS 276
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided February 1, 1926·No. No. 11,032.·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Denison

delivered the opinion of the court.

Bogardus brought suit to quiet title and had a decree. Mary L. Chase, one of the defendants, brings error.

The complaint alleges title in fee simple and possession in plaintiff. The answer denies this and alleges title in fee simple in defendant, Mary L. Chase.

It is claimed that plaintiff showed no title because the tax deed under which he claims is void on its face. It is so for the reason that it shows a sale for taxes on a date later than that required by statute without showing any cause for the delay. Hamer v. Glenn Inv. Co., 75 Colo. 423, 226 Pac. 299. It was necessary for plaintiff to show title. Wall v. Magnes, 17 Colo. 476, 30 Pac. 56; Clark v. Huff, 49 Colo. 197, 201, 112 Pac. 542; Walters v. Webster, 52 Colo. 549, 123 Pac. 952.

Judgment reversed.

Mr. Chief Justice Allen and Mr. Justice Whitford concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chase v. Bogardus, 243 P. 546, 78 Colo. 573, 1926 Colo. LEXIS 276 (Colo. 1926).

243 P. 546 (Chase v. Bogardus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richardson v. Halbekann
97 Colo. 175 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1935)
City & County of Denver v. Bach
22 P.2d 1114 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1933)
Kingore v. Wallace
276 P. 332 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1929)
City & County of Denver v. Murry
257 P. 359 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1927)
Howe v. Bennett
253 P. 29 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1927)
Wenig v. Lyons
252 P. 889 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1927)