Chase v. Bell Funeral Home

• Court: Superior Court of Delaware
• Decided: April 29, 2025
• Docket: N24C-05-216 CLS
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DARLA CHASE, Individually and as ) Administrator of THE ESTATE OF ) ROLAND T. JOHNSON, SR., and ) LAVERNE WRIGHT, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) C.A. No. N24C-05-216 CLS ) v. ) ) BELL FUNERAL HOME, L.L.C., ) COLEMAN’S FUNERAL SERVICES, ) HAVEN MEMORIAL PARK ) CEMETERY AND CREMATORY, ) INC., AND KIA CAREY, ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reargument (“the Motion”) and

the responses hereto,1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. Plaintiffs do not

identify any controlling precedent or legal principle that this Court overlooked, nor

do they demonstrate the Court misapprehended the law or facts in a way that would

affect the outcome of its decision.2

1 See D.I. 49, 50, 51, 52. 2 Cummings v. Jimmy’s Grille, Inc., 2000 WL 1211167, at *2 (Del. Super. Aug. 9, 2000).

1 Kia Carey in her personal capacity remains dismissed in this action. If

circumstances arise that justify returning her as a defendant, the Court is receptive

to that motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Calvin Scott Judge Calvin L. Scott, Jr.