Chase v. Bamberger

16 Ind. 214, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 97
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJune 1, 1861
StatusPublished

This text of 16 Ind. 214 (Chase v. Bamberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chase v. Bamberger, 16 Ind. 214, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 97 (Ind. 1861).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Suit on note. Answer; 1. Denial. 2. Fraud; specially setting out the facts. Demurrer sustained to the second paragraph of the answer. Trial; judgment for the plaintiff. On the trial, the note, which was signed by Chase and Gordon, was admitted in evidence; and the assignment thereof by the payee to the appellees, by the name of Bamberger & Co., was also admitted in evidence, without any testimony, other than said note and assignment.

It is insisted that the Court erred in sustaining the demurrer, and in admitting evidence. As to the latter, we do not think there was any error. The complaint averred that the defendants made the note, and that it was assigned to plaintiffs. The pleadings did not deny, nor were they such as to require proof of, the execution of the note or assignment.

There was no error in the ruling upon the demurrer.

S. Ooulson, for the appellants. Neff & Neff for the appellees.

The judgment is affirmed, with 3 per cent, damages and costs. '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Ind. 214, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chase-v-bamberger-ind-1861.