Chase Securities Corp. v. Husband

Supreme Court

Chase Securities Corp. v. Husband

302 U.S. 660, 58 S. Ct. 476

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 10, 1938·No. No. 621·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal from the Superior Court of Massachusetts.

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to file brief in opposition to the motion to dismiss or affirm is granted. The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) First National Bank v. Missouri, 263 U. S. 640, 666; Lewis v. Fidelity Co., 292 U. S. 559, 566; Jennings v. U. S. F. & G. Co., 294 U. S. 216, 219; Hornblower v. McGray, ante, p. 655. (2) Hudson Water Co. v. McCarter, 209 U. S. 349, 357; Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis, 240 U. S. 342, 363; Union Dry Goods Co. v. Georgia P. S. Corp., 248 U. S. 372, 375, 376; Home Bldg. & L. Assn. v. Blaisdell, 290 U. S. 398, 437, 438.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from the Superior Court of Massachusetts.

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to file brief in opposition to the motion to dismiss or affirm is granted. The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) First National Bank v. Missouri, 263 U. S. 640, 666; Lewis v. Fidelity Co., 292 U. S. 559, 566; Jennings v. U. S. F. & G. Co., 294 U. S. 216, 219; Hornblower v. McGray, ante, p. 655. (2) Hudson Water Co. v. McCarter, 209 U. S. 349, 357; Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis, 240 U. S. 342, 363; Union Dry Goods Co. v. Georgia P. S. Corp., 248 U. S. 372, 375, 376; Home Bldg. & L. Assn. v. Blaisdell, 290 U. S. 398, 437, 438.

Chase Securities Corp. v. Husband, 302 U.S. 660, 58 S. Ct. 476 (1938).

Pincite

302 U.S. 660 (Chase Securities Corp. v. Husband) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related