Chase Resorts, Inc. v. Johns-Manville Corp., Etc.

Eighth Circuit

Chase Resorts, Inc. v. Johns-Manville Corp., Etc.

620 F.2d 203, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 18012

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedMay 1, 1980

Docket79-1823

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 620 F.2d 203 (Chase Resorts, Inc. v. Johns-Manville Corp., Etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chase Resorts, Inc. v. Johns-Manville Corp., Etc., 620 F.2d 203, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 18012 (8th Cir. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Chase Resorts, Inc., and Four Seasons Lakesites, Inc., brought this action against Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Man-ville Sales Corporation alleging breach of warranty and fraud in the sale of an auto *204 matic watering system for a golf course. The case was tried to the Court, the Hon. H. Kenneth Wangelin, Chief Judge, presiding. On June 29, 1979, Judge Wangelin made extensive findings of fact and conclusions of law favorable to defendants. The opinion is reported at 476 F.Supp. 633 (E.D. Mo.1979). Judgment was entered accordingly.

We affirm on the basis of the District Court’s opinion. The Court found that Johns-Manville had not breached implied or express warranties and had not made fraudulent representations. These findings are supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous. See 8th Cir.R. 14.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Chase Resorts, Inc., and Four Seasons Lakesites, Inc., brought this action against Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Man-ville Sales Corporation alleging breach of warranty and fraud in the sale of an auto *204 matic watering system for a golf course. The case was tried to the Court, the Hon. H. Kenneth Wangelin, Chief Judge, presiding. On June 29, 1979, Judge Wangelin made extensive findings of fact and conclusions of law favorable to defendants. The opinion is reported at 476 F.Supp. 633 (E.D. Mo.1979). Judgment was entered accordingly.

We affirm on the basis of the District Court’s opinion. The Court found that Johns-Manville had not breached implied or express warranties and had not made fraudulent representations. These findings are supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous. See 8th Cir.R. 14.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

620 F.2d 203, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 18012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chase-resorts-inc-v-johns-manville-corp-etc-ca8-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack