Chase National Bank v. Tawaga

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Chase National Bank v. Tawaga

204 Misc. 246, 125 N.Y.S.2d 432, 1953 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2333

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 18, 1953

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 204 Misc. 246 (Chase National Bank v. Tawaga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chase National Bank v. Tawaga, 204 Misc. 246, 125 N.Y.S.2d 432, 1953 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2333 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Tenants’ occupancy of the premises is in violation of law. It became the landlords’ duty, after due notice from the department of housing and buildings, to remove the tenants (Wack v. Boutin, 81 N. Y. S. 2d 281, and cases therein cited; 6224 Sixth Ave. v. Chalfin Mach. Products, N. Y. L. J. June 13, 1952, p. 2365, col. 7; Hering v. Hagelstein, N. Y. L. J. Dec. 5,1952, p. 1395, col. 8; Marcellino v. Kowalenko, N. Y. L. J. March 27,1953, p. 1033, col. 2; Hinke v. Paulsen, N. Y. L. J. May 23, 1952, p. 2078, col. 3; Seligman v. Conte, N. Y. L. J. May 29, 1953, p. 1819, col. 6). The question of landlords’ motives or good faith is not germane in a proceeding of this character (Franzus v. Gardner, N. Y. L. J. Jan. 18, 1950, p. 219, col. 3; Wiener v. Eastern Parkway Farband Zionist Center, N. Y. L. J. June 15,1951, p. 2235, col. 2; Lipton v. Harris, N. Y. L. J. Feb. 1, 1952, p. 449, col. 3; Seligman v. Conte, supra).

The final orders in favor of tenants should be unanimously reversed upon the law, without costs and final orders directed in favor of landlords. Issuance of warrants stayed to and including August 31, 1953, on condition that tenants pay to the landlords for use and occupation the monthly rent as same becomes due together with any and all arrears in rent.

Walsh, Mubphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Final orders reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Tenants’ occupancy of the premises is in violation of law. It became the landlords’ duty, after due notice from the department of housing and buildings, to remove the tenants (Wack v. Boutin, 81 N. Y. S. 2d 281, and cases therein cited; 6224 Sixth Ave. v. Chalfin Mach. Products, N. Y. L. J. June 13, 1952, p. 2365, col. 7; Hering v. Hagelstein, N. Y. L. J. Dec. 5,1952, p. 1395, col. 8; Marcellino v. Kowalenko, N. Y. L. J. March 27,1953, p. 1033, col. 2; Hinke v. Paulsen, N. Y. L. J. May 23, 1952, p. 2078, col. 3; Seligman v. Conte, N. Y. L. J. May 29, 1953, p. 1819, col. 6). The question of landlords’ motives or good faith is not germane in a proceeding of this character (Franzus v. Gardner, N. Y. L. J. Jan. 18, 1950, p. 219, col. 3; Wiener v. Eastern Parkway Farband Zionist Center, N. Y. L. J. June 15,1951, p. 2235, col. 2; Lipton v. Harris, N. Y. L. J. Feb. 1, 1952, p. 449, col. 3; Seligman v. Conte, supra).

The final orders in favor of tenants should be unanimously reversed upon the law, without costs and final orders directed in favor of landlords. Issuance of warrants stayed to and including August 31, 1953, on condition that tenants pay to the landlords for use and occupation the monthly rent as same becomes due together with any and all arrears in rent.

Walsh, Mubphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Final orders reversed, etc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 Misc. 246, 125 N.Y.S.2d 432, 1953 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chase-national-bank-v-tawaga-nyappterm-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack