Chase Manhattan Financial Services, Inc. v. Weed

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Chase Manhattan Financial Services, Inc. v. Weed

471 So. 2d 159, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1482, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14628

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 12, 1985

DocketNo. 84-1968

StatusPublished

This text of 471 So. 2d 159 (Chase Manhattan Financial Services, Inc. v. Weed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chase Manhattan Financial Services, Inc. v. Weed, 471 So. 2d 159, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1482, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14628 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded for a new hearing on the issue of appellant’s entitlement to a deficiency judgment. There is no competent substantial evidence in the record to support the trial court’s denial of a deficiency award. However, rather than set the amount of the deficiency ourselves, we believe both parties are entitled to another opportunity to present evidence to the trial court as to the value of the secured property on the date of the foreclosure sale and the amount of deficiency, if any, to which appellant may be entitled.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and HERSEY and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded for a new hearing on the issue of appellant’s entitlement to a deficiency judgment. There is no competent substantial evidence in the record to support the trial court’s denial of a deficiency award. However, rather than set the amount of the deficiency ourselves, we believe both parties are entitled to another opportunity to present evidence to the trial court as to the value of the secured property on the date of the foreclosure sale and the amount of deficiency, if any, to which appellant may be entitled.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and HERSEY and DELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

471 So. 2d 159, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1482, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chase-manhattan-financial-services-inc-v-weed-fladistctapp-1985.