Chase Manhattan Bank v. State

368 N.E.2d 286, 42 N.Y.2d 1011, 398 N.Y.S.2d 536, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2343
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 13, 1977
StatusPublished

This text of 368 N.E.2d 286 (Chase Manhattan Bank v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chase Manhattan Bank v. State, 368 N.E.2d 286, 42 N.Y.2d 1011, 398 N.Y.S.2d 536, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2343 (N.Y. 1977).

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: The State is directed to pay petitioner [1012]*1012interest on the principal amount of the judgment from October 19, 1972. [See 40 NY2d 590.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MTR. CHASE MANHATTAN v. State
357 N.E.2d 366 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
368 N.E.2d 286, 42 N.Y.2d 1011, 398 N.Y.S.2d 536, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chase-manhattan-bank-v-state-ny-1977.