Chase Manhattan Bank v. Sailboat Apartment Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Sailboat Apartment Corp.

340 So. 2d 983, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15012

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 7, 1977

DocketNo. 75-519

StatusPublished

This text of 340 So. 2d 983 (Chase Manhattan Bank v. Sailboat Apartment Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Sailboat Apartment Corp., 340 So. 2d 983, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15012 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment and decision of this Court in this cause was filed July 29, 1975, and reported in 318 So.2d 575, wherein the judgment of the Circuit Court of the [984]*984Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida was affirmed; and

Whereas, said decision and judgment was declined review by the Supreme Court of Florida by certiorari proceedings, 334 So.2d 604; and

Whereas, in the November Term, 1976, the said cause came on to be heard before the Supreme Court of the United States on petition for writ of certiorari to this Court and response thereto; and

Whereas, the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States has been filed with this Court, which said mandate was predicated upon the order and judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States, entered November 1, 1976, - U.S. -, 97 S.Ct. 300, 50 L.Ed.2d 278 (1976), which said judgment vacated the judgment of this Court first above mentioned and remanded the case to this Court for consideration in light of National Bank of North America v. Associates of Obstetrics and Female Surgery, Inc., 425 U.S. 460, 96 S.Ct. 1632, 48 L.Ed.2d 92; accordingly,

The judgment and opinion of this Court filed July 29, 1975, is set aside and held for naught, and the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States filed November 1, 1976, is adopted as this Court’s opinion and judgment and the same shall accompany the mandate of this Court to the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida; and, accordingly,

The Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida is directed to hold a hearing for the purpose of determining whether the appellant, defendant in the trial court, has waived the protection of the venue provision of the National Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. § 94, and for such other proceedings as may be deemed appropriate in the premises.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment and decision of this Court in this cause was filed July 29, 1975, and reported in 318 So.2d 575, wherein the judgment of the Circuit Court of the [984]*984Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida was affirmed; and

Whereas, said decision and judgment was declined review by the Supreme Court of Florida by certiorari proceedings, 334 So.2d 604; and

Whereas, in the November Term, 1976, the said cause came on to be heard before the Supreme Court of the United States on petition for writ of certiorari to this Court and response thereto; and

Whereas, the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States has been filed with this Court, which said mandate was predicated upon the order and judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States, entered November 1, 1976, - U.S. -, 97 S.Ct. 300, 50 L.Ed.2d 278 (1976), which said judgment vacated the judgment of this Court first above mentioned and remanded the case to this Court for consideration in light of National Bank of North America v. Associates of Obstetrics and Female Surgery, Inc., 425 U.S. 460, 96 S.Ct. 1632, 48 L.Ed.2d 92; accordingly,

The judgment and opinion of this Court filed July 29, 1975, is set aside and held for naught, and the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States filed November 1, 1976, is adopted as this Court’s opinion and judgment and the same shall accompany the mandate of this Court to the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida; and, accordingly,

The Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida is directed to hold a hearing for the purpose of determining whether the appellant, defendant in the trial court, has waived the protection of the venue provision of the National Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. § 94, and for such other proceedings as may be deemed appropriate in the premises.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

340 So. 2d 983, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chase-manhattan-bank-v-sailboat-apartment-corp-fladistctapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack