Chase Manhattan Bank v. Nissho Pacific Corp.

21 A.D.2d 966, 251 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3616
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Chase Manhattan Bank v. Nissho Pacific Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 22 A.D.2d 215

Opinion

Motion granted only to the extent of amending the designation of the parties to this action so that Chase Manhattan Bank is designated plaintiff-appellant-respondent, The Nissho Pacific Corporation is designated defendant-appellant-respondent and lino ELaiun Kaisha, Ltd. is designated defendant-appellant-respondent. In all other respects the motion is denied, without prejudice, however, to defendant-appellant-respondent lino Kaiun Kaisha, Ltd.’s right to include in its appendix such additional parts of the record as are necessary to consider the questions involved.” (CPLR 5528, subd. [to].) Concur — Botein, P. J., McNally, Eager, Steuer and Staley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Nissho Pacific Corp., 21 A.D.2d 966, 251 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3616 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

21 A.D.2d 966 (Chase Manhattan Bank v. Nissho Pacific Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.