Chase Manhattan Bank v. Martin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Martin

306 A.D.2d 370, 760 N.Y.S.2d 859, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7127

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 16, 2003·Published

Opinion

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the nonparty Leonnette Martin appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Jonas, J.), entered June 24, 2002, which denied her motion, inter alia, to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the same court (Roberto, J.), dated September 5, 2000, based on lack of personal jurisdiction.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the plaintiff obtained personal jurisdiction over the nonparty appellant (see Levy v Robinson, 41 AD2d 558 [1973]).

The nonparty appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Goldstein, H. Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the nonparty Leonnette Martin appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Jonas, J.), entered June 24, 2002, which denied her motion, inter alia, to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the same court (Roberto, J.), dated September 5, 2000, based on lack of personal jurisdiction.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the plaintiff obtained personal jurisdiction over the nonparty appellant (see Levy v Robinson, 41 AD2d 558 [1973]).

The nonparty appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Goldstein, H. Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Martin, 306 A.D.2d 370, 760 N.Y.S.2d 859, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7127 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

306 A.D.2d 370 (Chase Manhattan Bank v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related