Chase Manhattan Bank v. Martin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Martin

306 A.D.2d 370, 760 N.Y.S.2d 859, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7127

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 16, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 306 A.D.2d 370 (Chase Manhattan Bank v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Martin, 306 A.D.2d 370, 760 N.Y.S.2d 859, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7127 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the nonparty Leonnette Martin appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Jonas, J.), entered June 24, 2002, which denied her motion, inter alia, to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the same court (Roberto, J.), dated September 5, 2000, based on lack of personal jurisdiction.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the plaintiff obtained personal jurisdiction over the nonparty appellant (see Levy v Robinson, 41 AD2d 558 [1973]).

The nonparty appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Goldstein, H. Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the nonparty Leonnette Martin appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Jonas, J.), entered June 24, 2002, which denied her motion, inter alia, to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the same court (Roberto, J.), dated September 5, 2000, based on lack of personal jurisdiction.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the plaintiff obtained personal jurisdiction over the nonparty appellant (see Levy v Robinson, 41 AD2d 558 [1973]).

The nonparty appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Goldstein, H. Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

306 A.D.2d 370, 760 N.Y.S.2d 859, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chase-manhattan-bank-v-martin-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack