Chase Manhattan Bank v. Leacock
This text of 154 A.D.2d 646 (Chase Manhattan Bank v. Leacock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Nahman, J.), dated April 27, 1988, which, after a hearing, denied the intervenors-appellants’ motion to set aside a mortgage foreclosure sale.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.
Upon our review of the record, we conclude that no basis exists for disturbing the hearing court’s determination that the foreclosure sale was conducted properly, and that the purchase price was not so inadequate as to warrant vacatur of the sale (see, RPAPL 231 [6]; Buttermark Plumbing & Heating Corp. v Sagarese, 119 AD2d 540; Hammerman v Ferguson, 50 AD2d 853). Spatt, J. P., Sullivan, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
154 A.D.2d 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chase-manhattan-bank-v-leacock-nyappdiv-1989.