Chase Manhattan Bank v. Gadon

682 A.2d 1266, 546 Pa. 46, 1996 Pa. LEXIS 1860
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 25, 1996·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of September, 1996, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted. The Petition to Consolidate is denied. The Petition Seeking Leave to Supplement Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted. The Petition Requesting Court’s Determination of Allocatur Petition in Light of Its Decision in Bank One, Columbus v. Mazaika is granted.

The order of the Superior Court is reversed. Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1730, 135 L.Ed.2d 25 (1996); Bank One, Columbus, N.A., v. Mazaika, — Pa. -, 680 A.2d 845 (1996).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Gadon, 682 A.2d 1266, 546 Pa. 46, 1996 Pa. LEXIS 1860 (Pa. 1996).

682 A.2d 1266 (Chase Manhattan Bank v. Gadon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A.
517 U.S. 735 (Supreme Court, 1996)
Bank One, Columbus, N.A. v. Mazaika
680 A.2d 845 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1996)