Chase Manhattan Bank of Maryland v. Rodney P. Travis, and Roberta Jackson Travis Shirley J. Travis Benjamin C. Winn Judith P. Layne

74 F.3d 1231, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38822, 1996 WL 23337
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 23, 1996
Docket95-2381
StatusPublished

This text of 74 F.3d 1231 (Chase Manhattan Bank of Maryland v. Rodney P. Travis, and Roberta Jackson Travis Shirley J. Travis Benjamin C. Winn Judith P. Layne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chase Manhattan Bank of Maryland v. Rodney P. Travis, and Roberta Jackson Travis Shirley J. Travis Benjamin C. Winn Judith P. Layne, 74 F.3d 1231, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38822, 1996 WL 23337 (4th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

74 F.3d 1231
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

CHASE MANHATTAN BANK OF MARYLAND, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Rodney P. TRAVIS, Defendant-Appellant,
and
Roberta Jackson TRAVIS; Shirley J. Travis; Benjamin C.
Winn; Judith P. Layne, Defendants.

No. 95-2381.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 11, 1996.
Decided: January 23, 1996.

Rodney P. Travis, Appellant Pro Se. Robert William Hesselbacher, Jr., Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, Baltimore, MD, for Appellee.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's order granting judgment to the Appellee and ordering the Appellants to vacate the property in dispute. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Chase Manhattan Bank of Maryland v. Travis, No. CA-95-154-A (E.D. Va. June 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 F.3d 1231, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38822, 1996 WL 23337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chase-manhattan-bank-of-maryland-v-rodney-p-travis-ca4-1996.