Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Fritz
444 N.E.2d 1010, 58 N.Y.2d 729, 458 N.Y.S.2d 546, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3931
This text of 444 N.E.2d 1010 (Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Fritz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Fritz, 444 N.E.2d 1010, 58 N.Y.2d 729, 458 N.Y.S.2d 546, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3931 (N.Y. 1982).
Opinion
Motion by the Fritz defendants and by defendant Warren Holding Co. for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion by defendant Karbiner for leave to appeal dismissed for untimeliness.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
444 N.E.2d 1010, 58 N.Y.2d 729, 458 N.Y.S.2d 546, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chase-manhattan-bank-na-v-fritz-ny-1982.