Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A. v. Fritz

89 A.D.2d 991

Opinion

On the court’s own motion, the decision and order (both dated September 7, 1982) in the above-captioned matter are amended nunc pro tunc so that the decretal paragraph reads as follows: Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, by providing that there shall be a recomputation of the amount due Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and matter remitted to Trial Term for entry of an appropriate amended judgment in accordance herewith. Mollen, P. J., Niehoff, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.