Chase Hunter v. Paul Higgs

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: January 7, 2013
• Docket: 12-2046
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2046

CHASE CARMEN HUNTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PAUL W. HIGGS, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of the City of Fredericksburg, Virginia; WILLIAM REYES, III, individually and in his official capacity as a Deputy for the City of Fredericksburg Sheriff and in his official capacity as a paid worker for the City of Fredericksburg; CITY OF FREDERICKSBURG, Virginia; NICHOLAS TALBERT, individually and in his official capacity as an employee for the City of Fredericksburg Sheriff and in his official capacity as a paid worker for the City of Fredericksburg,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cv-00513-JAG)

Submitted: December 26, 2012 Decided: January 7, 2013

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chase Carmen Hunter, Appellant Pro Se. Grant Edward Kronenberg, MORRIS & MORRIS, Richmond, Virginia; Medford Jennings Brown, IV, Jennifer Lee Parrish, PARRISH, HOUCK & SNEAD, PLC, Fredericksburg, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Chase Carmen Hunter appeals the district court’s order

denying her motion to appoint counsel. Our review of the record

reveals that we previously considered Hunter’s arguments and

affirmed the district court’s order. Hunter v. Higgs, 479 F.

App’x 470 (4th Cir. 2012) (No. 12-1971). Accordingly, we deny

leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss this appeal as

duplicative. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED