Chase Hunter v. Al Redmer

625 F. App'x 216

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: December 21, 2015
• Docket: 15-2102
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

Dismissed in part, affirmed in part by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are hot binding precedent in this circuit;

PER CURIAM:

Chase Carmen Hunter appeals the district court’s orders denying her requests for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. To the extent she seeks to appeal the denial of her. request for a temporary restraining order, we are without jurisdiction to .consider her appeal. See Virginia v. Tenneco, Inc., 538 F.2d 1026, 1029-30 (4th Cir.1976).

■ We do possess jurisdiction to review, for abuse of discretion, the district court’s de nial of her request for a preliminary injunction. 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) (2012); League of Women Voters of N.C. v. North Carolina, 769 F.3d 224, 250 (4th Cir.2014). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We thus affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hunter v. Redmer, No. 1:15-cv-02047JKB (E.D.Va. Sept. 4, 2015).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal in part and affirm in part. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART.