Chase Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Sober

455 So. 2d 1161, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2096, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15169
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 25, 1984·No. No. 84-295·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In view of this state’s policy of liberality toward setting aside defaults and allowing trials on the merits, see North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. Barber, 143 So.2d 849 (Fla.1962), we find that it was a gross abuse of discretion for the trial court to deny the appellant’s motion to vacate the default in the present case. The appellant presented a meritorious defense and sufficiently demonstrated excusable neglect by showing there was an inadvertent misfiling of the summons and complaint by a clerical employee. See Edwards v. City of Fort Walton Beach, 271 So.2d 136 (Fla.1972); North Shore Hospital; Associated Medical Institutions, Inc. v. Imperatori, 338 So.2d 74 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).

Accordingly, the order denying appellant’s motion to vacate default is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chase Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Sober, 455 So. 2d 1161, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2096, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15169 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

455 So. 2d 1161 (Chase Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Sober) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fratus v. Fratus
467 So. 2d 484 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Zimmerman v. Vinylgrain Industries
464 So. 2d 1353 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)